Uppsc: Commission surrounded by Ro / aro-2016

hear the news

hear the news

Problems may also escalate in relation to the 2016 Review Officer (RO) / Assistant Review Officer (ARO) exam for the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (UPPSC), surrounded by controversy over the recruitment of rectors as part of PCS-2018 is. Contrary to the terms of the tender, the commission had given a negative assessment during the preliminary examination of RO / ARO-2016, while the commission had a few days ago in another similar case against the result of the positions of the head teacher for recruitment. has revised the terms of the ad.Regarding the recruitment of 83 Headmaster positions in the context of PCS-2018, the High Court had asked the Commission to follow its call for tenders and to revise the result. On the matter, the commission turned to the Supreme Court, but the country’s Supreme Court rejected the Commission’s SLP. There is a similar dispute over the hiring of RO / ARO-2016 where the candidates have filed an application with the court.

The advertisement for RO / ARO-2016 was published in 2016. Three lakh 85 thousand 122 candidates applied for the exam. During the preliminary examination in November 2016, a questionnaire from a center in Lucknow went viral on WhatsApp. Former IPS officer Amitabh Thakur had filed an FIR in a police station in Lucknow.

Later, the CBCID investigation was carried out in the case of the paper leak and no concrete evidence of the paper leak was found. Before the commission published the results of the preliminary investigation, Amitabh Thakur filed a complaint with the court. Finally, the commission canceled the preliminary examination itself and carried out the preliminary examination again on September 20, 2020. There was no negative evaluation in the call for tenders for 2016, while the commission carried out another negative evaluation in the preliminary assessment.The commission argued that from 2019 a negative rating was introduced on all UPPSC exams. The preliminary review of RO / ARO-2016 was only carried out after 2019, which resulted in a negative assessment. At the same time, the candidates stated that only those candidates who applied under the 2016 call for applications were given a chance to take the exam. There is no new advertisement or application. Therefore, the Commission cannot breach the advertising conditions.

Candidate inquiries, the exam should be canceled
The candidates of the RO / ARO-2016 required that no negative assessment should be made in the examination. In this case, Sriti Singh has also filed an application with the court. Corruption Mukti Morcha President Kaushal Singh claims that the Commission carried out the preliminary examination in violation of the terms of the tender and also published the final selection results a few months ago. It is required of all competitive students, including Kaushal, that the committee cancels the entire examination and re-runs the preliminary examination without a negative assessment.

The selection was made from 260 RO / ARO positions
Under Review Officer (RO) / Assistant Review Officer (ARO) -2016, applicants were selected for eight types from 260 positions. Although the exam was conducted to recruit 303 positions, 43 positions remained vacant due to the lack of qualified candidates. Due to the controversy surrounding the paper leak, this recruitment could be completed in five years.

Detailed

Problems may also escalate in relation to the 2016 Review Officer (RO) / Assistant Review Officer (ARO) exam for the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission (UPPSC), surrounded by controversy over the recruitment of rectors as part of PCS-2018 is. Contrary to the terms of the tender, the commission had given a negative assessment during the preliminary examination of RO / ARO-2016, while the commission had a few days ago in another similar case against the result of the positions of the head teacher for recruitment. has revised the terms of the ad.

Regarding the recruitment of 83 Headmaster positions in the context of PCS-2018, the High Court had asked the Commission to follow its call for tenders and to revise the result. On the matter, the commission turned to the Supreme Court, but the country’s Supreme Court rejected the Commission’s SLP. There is a similar dispute over the hiring of RO / ARO-2016 where the candidates have filed an application with the court.

The advertisement for RO / ARO-2016 was published in 2016. Three lakh 85 thousand 122 candidates applied for the exam. During the preliminary examination in November 2016, a questionnaire from a center in Lucknow went viral on WhatsApp. Former IPS officer Amitabh Thakur had filed an FIR in a police station in Lucknow.

    .

( News Source – Amar Ujala )

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply