Deputy election officer defended the suspended adm

hear the news

hear the news

During the Panchayat electoral process, Deputy Election Officer Parasnath defended the suspended additional District Judge Anil Kumar Tripathi for negligently assigning election symbols to the District Panchayat member candidates in Niyamatabad. In a letter to the district returning officer, he announced that there was an error in the allocation of the symbol. The Additional District Judge was not held responsible for this.
During the three-stage Panchayat elections, the discrepancy in the allocation of symbols to the District 4 Panchayat candidate members of Niyamatabad was exposed. The candidate’s name was on the list, but no symbol was found. For this reason, another survey had to be carried out. The district returning officer had prepared his report and sent it to the government and the commission. In this context, the government had suspended the additional judicial district judge, who was made the hub for the nomination process for Zilla Panchayat members. The deputy electoral officer wrote in his letter that the mistake was not made deliberately in assigning the symbol to the Sector 4 candidate, but accidentally. In his clarification, the outgoing ADM also sent a letter to the DM, in which he quoted the letter from the deputy election officer. At the same time, they have asked not to be held directly responsible for the disruptions.

During the Panchayat electoral process, Deputy Election Officer Parasnath defended the suspended additional District Judge Anil Kumar Tripathi for negligently assigning election symbols to the District Panchayat member candidates in Niyamatabad. In a letter to the district returning officer, he announced that there was an error in the allocation of the symbol. The Additional District Judge was not held responsible for this.

During the three-stage Panchayat elections, the discrepancy in the allocation of symbols to the District 4 Panchayat candidate members of Niyamatabad was exposed. The candidate’s name was on the list, but no symbol was found. For this reason, another survey had to be carried out. The district returning officer had prepared his report and sent it to the government and the commission. In this context, the government had suspended the additional judicial district judge, who was made the hub for the nomination process for Zilla Panchayat members. The deputy electoral officer wrote in his letter that the mistake was not made deliberately in assigning the symbol to the Sector 4 candidate, but accidentally. In his clarification, the outgoing ADM also sent a letter to the DM, in which he quoted the letter from the deputy election officer. At the same time, they have asked not to be held directly responsible for the disruptions.

.

( News Source – Amar Ujala )

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply